10 March, 2007

The ICTR's Mandate Covers The Habyarimana Assassination: Alison Des Forges.



ICTR/MANDATE - THE ICTR'S MANDATE COVERS THE HABYARIMANA ASSASSINATION (DES FORGES)

Arusha, March 6, 2007 – Allison Des Forges, expert witness before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and in charge of Africa for the organization Human Rights Watch, affirmed Tuesday before the ICTR that she could not understand why no investigation had been opened into the downing of Juvenal Habyarimana’s plane.

“I am of the same opinion of Judge Goldstone, the first prosecutor of the ICTR, that this is part of the tribunal’s mandate,” she said during her cross-examination in Tharcisse Renzaho’s trial. According to the prosecutor currently in place, Mr. Abubacar Jallow, the investigation into the assassination which sparked the genocide is not part of the ICTR’s mandate.

Questioned by Mr. Francois Cantier, Renzaho’s lawyer, Mrs. Des Forges affirmed that she had no precise source but that it was “probable” that it was either the RPF which was the cause of the assassination or that it is of “capital importance that the ICTR delivers an official declaration on the basis of an investigation so that any doubt can be lifted on this assassination.” “It is difficult to understand the reasons for which such an investigation has not been conducted,” she said.

This investigation had been opened and conducted in 1997, notably by an Australian investigator at the Office of the Prosecutor, Mr. Michael Hourigan, who was banned from continuing it by Richard Goldstone’s successor, the Canadian Louise Arbour. Afterwards, only one French investigation, decided on the complaints of the families of the French pilots of the airplane, was conducted in Paris. It concluded last November and implicated those close to the current regime in Kigali. Nine international arrest warrants were signed and the judge in charge of the investigation demanded that the Rwandan president himself, Mr. Paul Kagame, be handed over to the ICTR. This investigation brought about a break in diplomatic relations between Rwanda and France.

PB/AT/KD
© Hirondelle News Agency

Akazu a Myth?

Agathe Habyarimana, reportedly an Akazu leader.


ICTR/ZIGIRANYIRAZO - AKAZU, OPPONENTS' INVENTION (WITNESS) Arusha, March 8, 2007 (FH) – The term “akazu” ("little house" in Kinyarwanda), largely used in the 1990s to designate former President Juvenal Habyarimana’s is an invention of the opposition, a witness declared Thursday before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).

Jean-Marie Vianney Nkezabera, an influential member of the principal opposition party for Habyarimana, the Republic Democratic Movement (MDR), affirmed that this word had been created by his political party in 1991 to “weaken” the former president and his supporters. Nkezabera was called as a witness for the defense of Protais Zigiranyirazo, a brother-in-law of Habyarimana, whom the prosecutor considers as one of the central personalities of the akazu. According to the prosecution, the akazu controlled all political, economic and military power in the country before and during the genocide of the Tutsis in 1994.

Zigiranyirazo is being tried for planning and participating in the genocide. He has pled not-guilty. “We wanted to weaken President Habyarimana. In the interim, among the slogans, we invented the term akazu. All those who could help him were considered caged people in a little hut,” explained Nkerzabera.

“We used the significant term maisonette pejoratively,” the witness continued. According to him, in the spirit of the MDR party, akazu referred to a “little hut which confined lepers.”

The witness indicated that when the MDR was formed in July 1991, the population, principally the rural population, had difficulty understanding that Habyarimana was an ordinary person who could be replaced as head of state.

“It was him, the leader that we wanted to isolate. We presented him as the center of the akazu. We wanted to take away his people. We wanted people to leave his party and join ours,” Nkezabera said.

Habyarimana was a member of the National Republican Movement for Democracy and Development (MRND). Rwanda adopted multiparty democracy in 1991.
“From September 1991, all parties started to use the term akazu. It entered political discourse to criticize those who continued to support the MRND,” Nkezabera added.

In the Zigiranyirazo trial, which started on October 3, 2005, the prosecutor called at least two witnesses who evoked the central role of the akazu. One of them, Michel Bagaragaza, the former official responsible for the tea industry in Rwanda, is himself accused before the ICTR. The defense contests the credibility of these witnesses. Zigiranyirazo was a prefect in Kibuye (west) and Ruhengeri (north) under Habyarimana. He is being defended by two Canadian lawyers: Mr. John Philpot and Mr. Peter Zaduk.

AT/PB/KD © Hirondelle News Agency


Editor: If corroborated, this could put a crimp into the widely advanced theory that the Rwandan genocide was planned ahead of time by a cadre surrounding President Habyarimana. Some ICTR defense lawyers, including Chris Black, maintain no such plan ever existed. Other individual, like General Romeo Dallare (in Le Point, September 94), choose to present it as a politicide, where the killings were based on political alliances rather than ethnicity.

Coca-Cola, Beer, and Darfur.

March 8, 2007 (OMAHA, Neb) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc. shareholders will have a chance to vote on whether the holding company should sell its stake in PetroChina at the annual meeting. Billionaire Warren Buffett decided to include a shareholder proposal about the Chinese oil conglomerate’s ties to Sudan.

Berkshire could have excluded the proposal because officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission agreed it was vague and indefinite, according to documents made public on Thursday.

"We’ve decided to include it anyway," Buffett said in a phone interview. "It’s a subject some shareholders are interested in."

The Omaha-based company posted a Web statement last month defending its 2.3 billion shares of PetroChina Co. in response to questions from shareholders and the media. Typically, Berkshire does not comment on its investments beyond what it is legally required to disclose.

Buffett and Berkshire’s vice chairman, Charlie Munger, plan to spend several hours answering questions at the annual meeting on May 5, and Buffett said there will be no time limit on the PetroChina discussion.

"We welcome a full discussion of the issue," Buffett said.
The proposal, submitted by Judith Porter from Pennsylvania, would prohibit Berkshire from investing in foreign companies that engage in activities U.S corporations cannot engage in because of presidential executive orders. Porter did not immediately return calls for comment.

The United States and international humanitarian groups have accused the Sudanese government of using its oil wealth to wage genocide against the people in the western Darfur region, and some groups have suggested that PetroChina has supported the Sudanese government.

An executive order former President Bill Clinton issued in 1997 that President George W. Bush later expanded limits U.S. investments in Sudan.

Porter’s proposal will face long odds at the annual meeting because Buffett controls 32.68 percent of the voting stock and because Berkshire’s shareholders hold the legendary investor’s opinion in high regard.

Buffett said he plans to defend Berkshire’s position at the meeting. Berkshire has said groups supporting the divestment of interests in Sudan may be confusing PetroChina with its parent company, Chinese National Petroleum Corp., which is owned by the Chinese government.

Berkshire said CNPC does do business in Sudan, but PetroChina shouldn’t be held responsible for the actions of its controlling shareholder. Berkshire also maintained that it sees no proof that PetroChina does business in Sudan.
"We think our position is correct," Buffett said.

The proposal would apply to all of the 8,936 current and any future presidential executive orders, which could significantly hurt Berkshire’s business, company Chief Financial Officer Marc Hamburg said in a letter to the SEC.

"On its face, neither the proposal nor the supporting statement adequately discloses to shareholders the extent to which the proposal would operate to effectively eliminate Berkshire’s and its subsidiaries’ foreign investment opportunities," Hamburg said in his letter.

Porter said the genocide in Sudan is her main concern, but she crafted the proposal to apply to all executive orders so it could cover future genocides.

"While it is not illegal for U.S. companies to invest in these foreign companies, I do believe that such investments violate the spirit if not the letter of the executive orders," Porter wrote in defense of her proposal. "As a shareholder of Berkshire I believe the company should adhere to these higher ethical standards."

In recent years, Berkshire has increased its investment in foreign companies, including last year’s $4 billion investment in Iscar Metalworking Cos., which is an Israeli company that makes metal cutting tools.

Last week Buffett also revealed Berkshire’s purchase of 229.7 million shares of Tesco PLC, Britain’s largest supermarket chain, and 3.49 million shares of South Korean steelmaker Posco.

Berkshire owns furniture, insurance, jewelry and candy companies, restaurants, natural gas and corporate jet firms and has major investments in such companies as The Coca-Cola Co. and Anheuser-Busch Co.

(AP)

Editor's Note: O.K. all you college activists for "Save Darfur" who support the business divestment campaign, if you want to send Mr. Buffet a message, stop buying all Coca-Cola products and all beers manufactured by Anheuser-Busch! That's right, no more Busch Light keggers. You could also stop buying the Washington Post, stop watching ABC and buying ABC-program affiliated merchandise by virtue of Mr. Buffet's shareholder status as well.

07 March, 2007

Congratulations to Ghana



This week, the website posts the black star to commemorate 50 years of independence for Ghana. May their next 50 years be blessed, peaceful, and fruitful.

-Editor.

05 March, 2007

ICTR Testimony by Abdul Ruzibiza 2006


Both documents are in English.

http://webpages.charter.net/jabdmb/RuzibizaCrossExaminationEnglish03182006.doc


http://webpages.charter.net/jabdmb/RuzibizaTestimonyEnglish03182006.doc

UPDF Under Scrutiny in Somalia

Somalia: UPDF’s Role in Somalia Mission Now in Doubt

Aweys Osman Yusuf
Mogadishu: 05, March 2007
Shabelle News Network

Widespread criticisms of the Ugandan military has led Black Star News, a New York-based African-American newspaper, to urge that the United States not provide funds to facilitate the UPDF’s deployment in Somalia. American lawmakers should ensure that “the US plays no role in this mind-boggling, ill-fated participation by Uganda’s army in the Somali mission,” Black Star News declared in a February 27 editorial.

Past human rights abuses committed by Ugandan troops are leading some analysts to warn that the African Union’s difficult peacekeeping mission in Somalia could fail to meet its objectives. Critics of Uganda’s leading role in the Somalia operation point to international monitoring groups’ condemnations of the Ugandan army’s mistreatment of civilians in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The International Court of Justice, better known as the World Court, ruled in 2005 that Uganda was liable for $10 billion in damages as a result of its intervention in the DRC. The court found that civilians had been tortured and killed during the course of Uganda’s 5-year occupation of eastern sections of the DRC. Human rights groups have also accused the Ugandan People’s Defence Force (UPDF) of brutalising displaced persons in northern Uganda as part of the counterinsurgency campaign against the Kony rebels.

Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Jendayi Frazer said earlier in February that the United States would provide $2 million to transport and $8 million to equip Ugandan soldiers to be deployed in Somalia. The Bush administration views stability in Somalia as crucial to US interests in the Horn and to the outcome of Washington’s “global war on terror.”

“The White House is so desperate,” Black Star News observed, “that it’s anointed Uganda, a country whose army was found liable for serious human rights abuses and is currently being investigated by the International Criminal Court, as regional policeman.” Doubts are also being raised as to whether Somalis will view the Ugandan troops as honest brokers.

A United Nations report late last year charged that Uganda was helping to arm Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government at a time when Islamist militias were taking control of large sections of the country. The report also said that a small number of Ugandan soldiers had been sent to Somalia to help defend the transitional government.

Leaders of some human rights organisations based in the United States have privately expressed their own concerns about the possibility of abusive treatment of Somalis by Ugandan troops. But none of these groups has publicly opposed Ugandan involvement in the peacekeeping initiative, which has been endorsed by the African Union.
One leading human-rights monitor with an office in the United States suggests that the UPDF may actually behave respectfully in Somalia.

“This is going to be a very high-profile operation,” notes the monitor, who asked that his name not be used because his organisation has made no formal comment on the Somalia peacekeeping mission. “All the eyes of Africa and of the world will be on this peacekeeping force, and Uganda will be at the centre of it because its troops are to be stationed in Mogadishu. So I think there will be considerable pressure on the Ugandans to show proper conduct.”

The UPDF will account for 1500 of the African troops to be deployed in Somalia. The African Union has authorised a total contingent of 8000 peacekeepers, but only half that many have so far been pledged. In addition to Uganda, four African nations – Nigeria, Ghana, Burundi and Malawi – have promised to assign troops to the mission.

Editor: Similar arguements have been leveled at the particpation of the RDF (14th Battalion currently) in Darfur.


U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Michael C. Gould, 3rd Air Force Commander, watches as Rwandan troops prepare to board a C-130 to Rwanda at El Fasher, Darfur, Sudan, July 21, 2005. The United States is providing transportation for 1,200 Rwandan forces to Sudan in support of the African Union Mission.

U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Bradley C. Church

MONUC Publicly Reveals RDF Soldiers Attempted to Integrate Into the FARDC.

Photo by MONUC.

One of the central points in my book is that demobilized RDF soldiers are crossing the Congo border to fight with General Laurent Nkundabatware. Many of them were reported by my sources in the area to have integrated into the mixed brigades that attacked FOCA and Mai-Mai in North Kivu recently. MONUC has publicly admitted via their Radio Okapi network to the Congolese arrest of 2 Rwandan soldiers and a Ugandan soldier in South Kivu who both fled from the mixing center in Luberizi, North Kivu. The only reason they state they did not integrate into the FARDC was because the living condtions in the camp were so abominable, they could not stand it any longer.

"Sud-Kivu : arrestation de 11 anciens fidèles à Laurent Nkunda," Radio Okapi. English Translation. 2 March, 2007. http://www.radiookapi.net/article.php?id=6957


04 March, 2007

Somalia: An Oily Cliché.

By David Barouski
17 February, 2007
Original version posted at http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=2&ItemID=12190.
Revised and Edited 21 April 2007.

Today, it is cliché to say the United States (U.S.) is off on another oil-acquisition conquest anytime they invade or support a war on an Arabic or Near Eastern nation. In the case of Somalia, the cliché may neverless prove to be true. While undoubtedly, the U.S. and its Ethiopian proxy force conquered Somalia and “liberated” it from the clutches of Al-Qaeda primarily for geostrategic reasons, including a potential launching point for a coordinated attack on Iran, friendly territory close to the Arabic-majority Northern Sudan, and additional ports under their control to house forces that will protect the Strait of Hormuz [the primary shipping point of Middle Eastern oil], etc), [1] but Somalia is indeed awash in yet undiscovered and untapped oil and natural gas deposits that provide a tantalizing business opportunity if lasting peace can be achieved.

In 1990, just prior to the horrible famine of virtually Biblical porportions that claimed thousands of lives in Somalia, Mohamed Said Barre was in charge of the country. Barre signed off nearly two-thirds of Somalia's territory to Conoco, Amoco, Chevron, and Phillips (this was prior to the Conoco-Phillips merger). Unfortunately for them, Barre was overthrown by Mohammed Farah Aideed of the rival Hebr Gedr clan in January 1991 and a brutal civil war began shortly thereafter.

As a result, the oil giants were unable to work on their concessions for two reasons. One, the constant fighting, robbery, and pirating off the coast created an impossible work environment. Second, it was technically illegal because Somalia did not have a centrally-recognized government anymore. Since Somalia was run by a “warlord” that was illegal to conduct business with, the oil companies were out of luck. Either the U.S. had to legitimize Aideed in the eyes of the international community to have him recognized as the central authority in the country or they remove him.

As one of his last acts as president, George Herbert Walker Bush (who owned oil concessions across the Gulf of Aden in Marib, Yemen via Hunt Oil) sent the first wave of U.S. Army soldiers to Somalia to officially help deliver food to the starving Somalis. Meanwhile, U.S. Special Envoy to Somalia Robert Oakley kept in daily contact with Aideed from December 1992 to May 1993.[2] He was unsuccessful in his negotiations to end the fighting.
President Bill Clinton then launched “Operation Restore Hope.” Conoco’s office in Mogadishu served as a de facto U.S. Embassy for the arriving U.S. Marines force after the original embassy was shelled and looted. Mr. Oakley and Marine General Frank Libutti later wrote a letter of commendation to Conoco Somalia’s General Manager Raymond Marchand thanking him for his service.[3]

After a series of unsuccessful assassination attempts by U.S. forces, the Somalis struck back during a U.S. raid in the infamous “Blackhawk Down” incident (the U.S. Army dubbed it the “Battle of the Black Sea” while the Somalis’ called it “Maalinti Rangers” [Day of the Rangers]) on 3-4 October, 1994 that claimed the lives of 18 American and one Malaysian soldier.[4] President Clinton subsequently pulled out of Somalia and the place was left to its own devices while the U.S. cultivated relationships with Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, Djibouti’s President Hassan Gouled, and Eritrea’s President Isaias Afewerki. Aideed was eventually assassinated in 1996 by Osman Hassan Ali Atto.

Somalia continued to be deeply fractured after the death of Aideed. The extreme northwest corner of Somalia, known as Somaliland, declared its independence in 1991, but it did not receive any diplomatic recognition internationally. The adjacent region to the east, known as Puntland, followed suit in 1998 under the leadership of its President (and resident warlord) Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed, but with one major difference: they only wanted to be a separate semi-autonomous Somali state, not an independent nation.

Puntland had lucrative oil concessions, but the turnover of local and national Somali governments rendered most of the contracts null and void. The companies also faced a legal problem. Since Puntland was not an independent country, the companies had to deal with the central government in order to do business. The problem was…there was still no central government entity.

Somalia began toying with the idea creating an internationally recognized government in 2001. Indeed, French oil giant TotalElfFina signed an optomistic agreement for a concession in southern Somalia. The U.S. made moves to reestablish itself in Somalia after 9/11. A Special Forces team was deployed to Hargeisa Airport in Somaliland under the cover of a USAID mission. They were sent to secure hangers and warehouses to store "security equipment." The U.S. also met with leaders of the Rahanwein Resistance Army, a rebel group fighting against the Mogadishu government.[5]
After lots of infighting for power between rival clans, the first government plan was signed in July 2003. Kenya presided over the process and the federal charter was signed in September 2003. However, fighting broke out again in early 2004, particularly in the south, and it reached Mogadishu by the end of May. As a result, the Somali Transitional Government was exiled to Nairobi.

Despite the chaos, parliament members were sworn in during August 2004. They voted Puntland’s Abdullahi Yusuf (from the Darod clan, which is not well-liked in Mogadishu) president. President Yusuf is a career soldier who served as Somalia’s mlitary attaché to the Soviet Union. When the U.S. backed Barre’s rise to power, Mr. Yusuf refused to turn on his Soviet Allies and was imprisoned. After he was released, he took part in a failed coup attempt on Said Barre. He fled to Kenya and befriended the Ethiopians. He later returned to northern Somalia and has run Puntland since its independence in 1998, making him a valuble ally to U.S. oil interests if he could shed his communist-supporting background.

In December 2004, Ali Mohammed Gedi was appointed the Prime Minister. He hails from the Abgaal sub-clan of Mogadishu's Hawiye clan, one of the two largest clans in the country. The new government relocated to Mogadishu and by May 2005, Mohammed Qanyare Affrah, Osman Ali Atto, and Muse Sudi Yalahow united their militias as a de facto government army. By late 2005, the government’s transition process was derailed.

Some factions were not happy the largest clans possessed all the power positions. President Yusuf and Prime Minister Ghedi both survived assassination attempts and retreated back to Kenya. By October 2005, the Transitional Government was purchasing large amounts of arms from Yemen and arming allied clans to defend Mogadishu and Baidoa to the south. Ethiopia was also suppling the Transitional Government with weapons.[6]

Recent History

From the beginning of 2006 until July, fierce fighting between rival clans and political movements occurred. It culminated with the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC) seizing control of Mogadishu, and in effect, the country, though most of the Transitional Government was still located in Baidoa. While Eritrea armed the UIC, the U.S. unsuccessfully backed the opposing forces, called the Alliance for the Restoration of Peace and Counter-Terrorism (ARPC).[7] The so-called warlords leading the ARPC, Mohamed Dheere, Bashir Raghe, and Mahamed Qanyare, had been spying for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) years. A U.S. diplomat at the Nairobi Embassy was even fired for criticizing the CIA’s policy.[8] Once again, U.S. business interests were thwarted and the UIC’s leader, Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, was already on the U.S.’ official terrorist list for heading al-Itihaad al-Islamiya, a group supposedly linked to Al-Qaeda during the 1990s, making it illegal for them to do business with his regime.[9]

Beginning in 2005, Prime Minister Gedi demanded all business proposals go through the Transitional Government. He forbade anyone to approach the local administrations in Puntland, but he was willing to allow business there provided he approved of it. The Australian firm Range Resources Limited signed an agreement with the government of Puntland for exclusive rights to all their minerals, including oil, lead, zinc, copper, iron, manganese, tin, beryl, tantalum, niobium (columbium), uranium, coal, and gypsum.[10] Range Resources obtained permission to exploit the land from Puntland President Mohamud Muse Hirse on 18 October, 2005, and from Prime Minister Gedi on 2 November, 2005.[11] They are also bidding to buy addition consessions from the Korea National Oil Corporation (KNOC).

Range Resources is run by Non-Executive Chairman Sir Samuel Kwesi Jonah. Sir Jonah is a Board Member of: Lonmin, the Commonwealth African Investment Fund (Comafin), Transnet Limited, Anglo-American Platinum Corporation Limited, the Ashesi University Foundation, Equinox Minerals (Chairman), the uranium-producing nuclear power company UraMin Incorporated (Chairman), Anglo-American Corporation, Moto Goldmines Limited, Scharrig Mining (Chairman), Sierra Rutile Limited (Chairman), Sierra Resources Holding, Titanium Resources Group, Copper Resources Corporation (with George Arthur Forrest and George Andrew Forrest, both major players in the Katanga Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo), Standard Bank Group of South Africa, Bayport Holding Limited, Transnet Limited, Equator Exploration Limited in Nigeria and São Tomé – Príncipe (with Baronness Lynda Chalker), and Mittal Steel (in the proverbial hot seat for a contract they signed with the government of Liberia).

Sir Jonah is a member of the U.N. Secretary General's Global Compact Advisory Council, South African President Thabo Mbeki's International Investment Advisory Council, the African Regional Advisory Board of the London Business School, First Atlantic Merchant Bank, Defiance Mining, Ghanian President John Kufuor's Ghana Investors' Advisory Council, President Obasanjo Nigerian Investors’ Advisory Council, and serves as a Presidential Advisor to President Mohamud Muse Hersi of the Somali state of Puntland. He also holds an honorary British knighthood, the Star of Ghana and several other international awards and titles. He also recently announced the creation of his own mining company.

80% of Range Resources’ concession belongs to its business partner Canmex Minerals of Vancouver.[12] The President of Canmex is none other than Swedish Lukas Lundin, son of former Shell engineer Adolf Lundin, a personal friend of former U.S. President and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director George Herbert Walker Bush. Lukas and his father run several businesses including Lundin Mining Corporation (Sweden and Ireland), Tanganyka Oil Company (drilling in northeastern Syria and Egypt), Valkyries Petroleum Corporation (Russia), Lundin East Africa, Lundin Petroleum Corporation[13] (which owns 24.5% of Block 5B in Sudan, located on the southern part of the Muglad Basin in Southern Sudan),[14] Vostok Nafta Investments, and Tenke Mining Corporation. Tenke has a lucrative copper and columbite-tantalite (coltan) concession in the Katanga Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Adolf Lundin originally received the concession in 1996 after George H.W. Bush called President Joseph Mobutu on Mr. Lundin’s behalf before he was forced out of his country the following year.[15]

Meanwhile, Perth-based Ophir Energy seeks to drill in Somaliland. Ophir is led by Alan Stein and is 50%-owned by South Africa’s Mvelaphanda Holdings.[16] Mvelphanda is run by Tokyo Sexwale and its Board of Directors includes Michael Beckett (former Chairman of Ashanti Goldfields, a company prevously run by Sir Jonah), and Bernard Van Rooyen (former director of the Canadian firm Banro Resources). Ophir was reportedly introduced to Somalia by Mvelaphanda’s partner Dr Andrew Chakravarty, who’s wife is a well-connected Somali national. Mr. Chakravarty’s Rova Energy Corporation acquired offshore concessions formerly belonging to Equitable Life Investment Company and its U.S. partner Somapetroleum. Ophir currently is a 75% shareholder of Rova.[17]

The Rest, as They Say, is History

Somalia’s Transitional Government desired to keep Puntland as a part of the larger Somalia. This fact, coupled with several nations’ unwillingness to work with the UIC (who may or may not recognize the contracts) led to a need to restore the Transitional Government in Mogadishu and remove the UIC. This line of thinking was directly in line with the U.S., who wanted to control Somali for the aforementioned geostrategic reasons and also to prevent the nation from becoming a “terrorist safehaven.” The U.S. backed Ethiopia’s invasion of Somalia to stamp out the UIC once-and-for-all. Indeed, Eritrean President Afewerki stated, “The Ethiopian invasion of Somalia is not spontaneous, but a long time and well organized plan initiated by the Washington administration,” that was, “tantamount to terrorism.” [18] They supplied air support (bombing and strafing runs) and Special Forces soldiers to aid in the mission. U.S. Naval ships from Djibouti patrolled the Somali coast. The UIC was forced into Kenya, where many of its leaders were subsequently arrested. Those who remained at large fled into hiding in southern Somalia. Chaos reigns in Mogadishu as UIC-backers and an increasing number of militia who see the Eithiopian troops as an occupying force launch daily attacks in the capital. Puntland and Somaliland are fighting between each other.

Meanwhile, the U.S. officially continues to hunt Al-Qaeda in Somali. They are pushing for an African peacekeeping force to be deployed in the nation as soon as possible. Unsurprisingly, two nations with a history of acting as U.S. proxies in the region answered the call. The Ugandan People’s Defense Force (UPDF) pledged two battalions to enforce the peace and train the Somali army. The U.S. has pledged to provide logistics support for Uganda,which likely will include airlift support.[19] If the private military contractor Military Professional Resources Incorporated (MPRI) gets involved in the logistics like they have in Darfur,[20] the context of U.S. involvement in Somalia could take on a whole new outlook, especially if counterinsurgency operations become the norm. MPRI offers a perfect opportunity to embed U.S. operatives to do the illicit bidding of the Pentagon the U.S. Armed Forces cannot.

The Somali Government has been reinstalled in Mogadishu and though violence is constant in the city, the government has bulldozed forward in an attempt to gain legitimatcy. Many of the cabinet members are dual citizens, with the majority coming from Canada. Others are former warlords. The Deputy Prime Minister is Hussein Farah Aideed, the son of the late warlord Mohammed Farah Aideed. In contrast to his father, Hussein is actually a naturalized American citizen and a former U.S. Marine who served in the Gulf War. He even served as a U.S. emissary during Operation Restore Hope, where he met with his father several times.[21]

With a central government in place, the corporations with concessions in the more peaceful northern region of the country can begin their work. The China National Oil Corporation (CNOC) and India’s state-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) are interested in purchasing concessions. ConocoPhillips stated they are not interested in doing business in Somalia at this time. Will ChevronTexaco and other American oil giants take advantage of the opportunity to exploit Somalia’s “black gold”? Only time will tell, but Ophir, Rova, Range Resources, and other oil industry giants are probably grateful the U.S. and Ethiopia pacified Somalia.


Appendix I: Documentation

Letter from President Hirse to Consort Private Limited: http://www.zmag.org/LetterHirse.pdf
Letter from Prime Minister Gedi to the Government of Puntland: http://www.zmag.org/LetterGedi.pdf.
These letters and futher details, can be found on Range Resources' website at http://www.rangeresources.com.au/somalia.cfm.

[1] Note: The U.S. already has rights to a base in Somaliland even though the U.S. has refused to recognize its independence. The U.S. also had surveillance stations on the island of Burr Gaabo in Somali territoral waters and Ras Kambooni, the recent site of a U.S. bombing run that reportedly intended to kill Al-Qaida member Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, the prime suspect in the U.S. Embassy bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Saalam in 1998. The U.S. had several signal intelligence (SIGINT) stations in Kenya. One was located on the island of Lamu and a separate station was in Kilifi. (Madsen, Wayne. “Jaded Tasks: Brass Plates, Black Ops, & Big Oil.” Walterville, Oregon: Trineday. 2006. pg. 22-23.)
[2] Madsen, Wayne. “Genocide and Covert Operations in Africa 1993-1999.” Lampeter, Ceredigion, Wales, United Kingdom: Edwin Mellen Press, Limited. 1999. pg. 31.
[3] “The Oil Factor In Somalia,” Mark Fineman. Los Angeles Times. 18 January, 1993.
[4] Bowden, Mark. “Blackhawk Down: A Story of Modern War.” New York, New York: Penguin Putnam Incorporated. 1999.
[5] Madsen, Wayne. “Jaded Tasks: Brass Plates, Black Ops, & Big Oil.” Walterville, Oregon: Trineday. 2006. pg. 222.
Note: The British were also interested in Somaliland. In March 2004, it president, Daher Riyale Kahin visited the United Kingdom, where he spoke to the House of Commons and visited Buckingham Palace. The company DNO Britain Limited expressed an interest in obtaining a concession. (Ibid.)
[6] “UN: Arms Pouring Into Somalia,” Al-Jazeera. 8 October, 2006.
[7] “U.S. Secretly Backing Warlords in Somalia,” Karen DeYoung, Emily Wax. The Washington Post. 17 May, 2006.

Note: A confidential U.N. Security Council report revealed several armed Islamic groups armed and fought with the UIC, including Hezbollah and fighters from several Islamic nations including Saudi Arabia.
[8] “Somalia: Fighting in the Shadows.” Jeffery Bartholet, Michael Hirsh. Newsweek. 5 June, 2006.

Note: One of the planners for these types of intelligence operations was Steven Cambone’s Deputy Undersecretary of Intelligence at the Pentagon, General William “Jerry” Boykin, who is known for his anti-Islamic comments. Boykin commanded the Delta Force team deployed in Mogadishu in 1993.
[9] “Profile: Somalia’s Islamist Leader,” Joseph Winter. BBC News. 30 June, 2006.
[10] Range Resources Limited. “Exclusive Rights to All Minerals in Puntland.” Company Announcements Office. 5 October, 2005.
[11] President Mohamud Muse Hirse. “Letter to Consort Private Limited and Mr. Tony Black.” Office of the President. 18 October, 2005; Prime Minister Ali Mohammed Gedi. “Letter to Puntland State of Somali and Vice President Hassan Dahir Mohamud. Offic of the Prime Minister. OPM/251/05. 2 November 2006.
[12] “Oil Profits Boost East Africa Exploration,” Sudan Tribune. 22 February, 2007.
[13] Note: Lundin Petroleum also owns blocks 2 and 6 in Ethiopia. Both blocks are located in the Ogaden Province, were the Ogaden National Liberation Front has been at war with the Ethiopian Government. The former Islamic government of Somalia seeks to want to integrate the province into a Greater Somalia state. (“Ogaden Rebels Challenge Ethiopia’s Oil Deal With Lundin,” Alexander’s Gas and Oil Connections. Volume 11, Issue 23. 14 November, 2006.)
[14] “Sudan.” Lundin Petroleum. Press Release. January 2006. pg. 1.
[15] Palast, Greg. “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.” New York, New York: Plume (Penguin Group). 1st American Edition. 2003. pg. 93.
[16] “Minnows See Oil Seeping Out From Fractured State,” Eleanor Gillespie, Jon Marks. African Energy. Issue 100. 20 July, 2006.
[17] Ibid.
[18] “Humilitated Eritrea Blames US for Somali War,” African News Agency. 2 January, 2007.
[19] State House of the Republic of Uganda. “’US to Provide UPDF Support to (sic) Somalia’ - Frazier.” Press Release. 29 January, 2007.
[20] Confidential Source. 2007.
[21] Kevin Sites. “Son of Aideed.” Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone. Yahoo News. 29 September, 2005. http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs1077.

Compendium of RPF crimes compiled by Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana

Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana was a professor at the University of Gisenyi and he also worked for the United Nations Development Project in Rwanda. His family and several of his relatives were murdered by the RPA.

http:/www.akagera-rhein.de/publics/letter_jean.pdf
 
Locations of visitors to this page Web Page Design