10 November, 2011

INGABIRE TRIAL - DEFENCE “CROSS-EXAMINATION” AFTER REHEARSALS.

Press Release
10 November 2011

After a one week postponement to allow the prosecutor's «witnesses» to review the “cross-examination” of a pre-submitted questionnaire, the show resumed today in Kigali Court. The judges are now pushing for a speedy trial to wrap the case as soon as possible. This raises a big question: Can Rwandan courts really handle international criminal cases? According to the presiding judge and the Prosecutors, cross-examination is not allowed in Rwanda.

The opposition party leader's political trial continues to attract the attention of the public, media, and key diplomats. His Excellency Ben Llewellyn-Jones, the British High Commissioner and the Embassy's Political Affairs councillor spent some time today following the debates in the courtroom.

Suspect Tharcisse Nditurende responded to some defence questions relating to the charges of Complicity in acts of terrorism (arts. 21(3°), 75 and 76, Law N° 45/2008 of 9/9/2008); Attempted attacks on the established powers and constitutional principles by terrorism or armed force (arts. 164, 21, 22 and 24 of the Penal Code, Law N° 21/1977 of 18/08/1977); recruitment into an armed force. The trial will continue tomorrow.

Though he had a whole week and all the necessary assistance to prepare his answers, he surprised the audience when he confessed that he never knew the names used by his courier to Kinshasa, allegedly sent to meet with Madame Victoire Ingabire. This complicates the whole tracking of their travel
data. Apart from their stories and a visibly made up script there is no other evidence that the real witness KARUTA even travelled to Kinshasa that time. The suspect stated he never received the oral mission report and it was extremely dangerous to carry written documents. He forgot that, immediately upon the arrest of  Madame Victoire Ingabire, the prosecutor created the opinion that the arrest was prompted by evidence found in a bunch of written documents seized on suspect Vital
UWUMUREMYI when he was fleeing back to the DRC.

According to Barrister Iain Edwards, the co-accused never met the key defendant face-to-face during their adventures in the Congo. «Their trips to Kinshasa or elsewhere, if they really occurred, have no direct link to my client. Nothing shows they actually had an agenda to meet or do any
business together».


Done in Kigali,
Boniface Twagirimana
Interim Vice President
FDU-Inkingi
 
Locations of visitors to this page Web Page Design